<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Carling iPint fails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaquake.co.uk/2008/07/24/why-the-carling-ipint-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaquake.co.uk/2008/07/24/why-the-carling-ipint-fails/</link>
	<description>The blog of digital consultant and writer Philip Buxton</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brand v response - the false debate - Mobile Matters - Blogs - Brand Republic</title>
		<link>http://mediaquake.co.uk/2008/07/24/why-the-carling-ipint-fails/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brand v response - the false debate - Mobile Matters - Blogs - Brand Republic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaquake.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] mobile allows users to go ‘the next step’ – to lead-generation - in a way that backs up my [small] criticism of the iPint.Through mechanisms like click-to-call and click-to-SMS, we can enable potential customers to do [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mobile allows users to go ‘the next step’ – to lead-generation &#8211; in a way that backs up my [small] criticism of the iPint.Through mechanisms like click-to-call and click-to-SMS, we can enable potential customers to do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

